Editing Workflow:Assessing information

{{Infobox COW
|status=Production
|input=Submitted datasets.
|output=Assessed datasets. This workflow is part of the curation to ensure FAIR datasets within a Trusted Digital Repository
|organisation=SEADDA community of archaeologists and digital specialists
|organisationurl=https://www.seadda.eu/
}}
==Workflow Description==

<!-- To add an image of your workflow, open the "Upload File" link on the left in a new browser tab and follow on screen instructions, then return to this page and add the name of your uploaded image to the line below - replacing "workflow.png" with the name of your file. Replace the text "Textual description" with a short description of your image. Filenames are case sensitive! If you don't want to add a workflow diagram or other image, delete the line below  -->

[[File:workflow.png|Textual description]]<br>

<!-- Describe your workflow here with an overview of the different steps or processes involved-->

A member of staff runs through a checklist to ensure that:
- The dataset confirms to the collection policy of the repository
- Data deposit contains no malware (all files).
- Digital objects are in correct formats (all files).
- Data deposit has collection-level metadata.
- All digital objects have core descriptive metadata (all files).
- Digital objects have additional technical metadata (all files).
- Digital objects can be opened, are valid, and can be reused (all files, representative sample for large datasets) .
- The data deposit has no sensitive data concerns (all files, representative sample for large datasets).
- Content is appropriate and complete (all files, representative sample for large datasets).
- The dataset is structured in a manner which is clear for the purposes of reusing data.

==Purpose, Context and Content==
<!-- Describe what your workflow is for - i.e. what it is designed to achieve, what the organisational context of the workflow is, and what content it is designed to work with -->

Within the SEADDA consortium, workflows for dealing with assessing information were examined from three long standing digital repositories for archaeological data: the Archaeology Data Station of Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), the Swedish National Data Service (SND), and the Archaeology Data Service (ADS). 

==Evaluation/Review==
<!-- How effective was the workflow? Was it replaced with a better workflow? Did it work well with some content but not others? What is the current status of the workflow? Does it relate to another workflow already described on the wiki? Link, explain and elaborate -->

==Further Information==
<!-- Provide any further information or links to additional documentation here -->
https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.67.3

<!-- Add four tildes below ("~~~~") to create an automatic signature, including your wiki username. Ensure your user page (click on your username to create it) includes an up to date contact email address so that people can contact you if they want to discuss your workflow -->
[[User:Valentijn|Valentijn]] ([[User talk:Valentijn|talk]]) 11:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/172.104.134.96|172.104.134.96]] 11:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

<!-- Note that your workflow will be marked with a CC3.0 licence -->