Difference between revisions of "Developer Tools in QA: Novice's Toolkit"

From COPTR
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New article about Rebekah Glendinning's Novice's Toolkit.)
 
(Added image.)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Infobox tool
 
{{Infobox tool
|purpose=A collaborative document providing an easy entry point for non-developers and novice web archivers to identify Quality Assurance issues using built-in browser developer tools.
+
|image=FFwebdevtoolsCOPTRwiki.png
|homepage=[[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yC3rP6DJrJNi787wYsPq3aHlFZJjHvXbbEaO0YczTlY/edit?usp=sharing|Developer Tools in QA: Novice’s Toolkit]]
+
|purpose=A collaborative document which non-developers can adapt to record QA methods using built-in browser developer tools.
 +
|homepage=[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yC3rP6DJrJNi787wYsPq3aHlFZJjHvXbbEaO0YczTlY/edit?usp=sharing Developer Tools in QA: Novice's Toolkit]
 
|language=English
 
|language=English
 
|function=Quality Assurance
 
|function=Quality Assurance
Line 10: Line 11:
 
<!-- Describe the what the tool does, focusing on it's digital preservation value. Keep it factual. -->
 
<!-- Describe the what the tool does, focusing on it's digital preservation value. Keep it factual. -->
  
== User Experiences ==
+
 
<!-- Add hotlinks to user experiences with the tool (eg. blog posts). These should illustrate the effectiveness (or otherwise) of the tool. Use a bullet list. -->
+
A beginner's guide to using built-in browser developer tools to explore Quality Assurance (QA) issues in web archive captures. This toolkit is focused primarily on archivists who have [[Archive-It]] subscriptions and use [[Heritrix]], [[Brozzler]] and [[Webrecorder]]/Conifer. The toolkit has been used primarily with Google Chrome and Firefox browsers, although the same type of analysis could be applied to other browsers.
 +
 
 +
It is a "living document", intended to be shared and updated collaboratively. It is aimed at new web archivists, and web archivists who are new to using web developer tools for QA. Web developer tools can be quickly accessed in Firefox by pressing Crtl+Shift+E, Crtl+Shift+I in Chrome.
 +
 
 +
The toolkit includes diagnostic use cases for the "elements", "console" and "network" sections of browser development tools. These can help the archivist spot locations of missing [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSS CSS] elements, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript javascript] issues which might affect replay, and errors occurring in network requests, which can help identify resources missing in a copy.
 +
 
 +
<!--== User Experiences ==
 +
Add hotlinks to user experiences with the tool (eg. blog posts). These should illustrate the effectiveness (or otherwise) of the tool. Use a bullet list. -->

Latest revision as of 13:18, 4 February 2022




Developer Tools in QA: Novice's Toolkit
A collaborative document which non-developers can adapt to record QA methods using built-in browser developer tools.
Homepage: "[https" has not been listed as valid URI scheme.Developer Tools in QA: Novice's Toolkit
Language:English
Function:Quality Assurance
Content type:Document



Description[edit]

A beginner's guide to using built-in browser developer tools to explore Quality Assurance (QA) issues in web archive captures. This toolkit is focused primarily on archivists who have Archive-It subscriptions and use Heritrix, Brozzler and Webrecorder/Conifer. The toolkit has been used primarily with Google Chrome and Firefox browsers, although the same type of analysis could be applied to other browsers.

It is a "living document", intended to be shared and updated collaboratively. It is aimed at new web archivists, and web archivists who are new to using web developer tools for QA. Web developer tools can be quickly accessed in Firefox by pressing Crtl+Shift+E, Crtl+Shift+I in Chrome.

The toolkit includes diagnostic use cases for the "elements", "console" and "network" sections of browser development tools. These can help the archivist spot locations of missing CSS elements, javascript issues which might affect replay, and errors occurring in network requests, which can help identify resources missing in a copy.