Editing Workflow:Browsertrix-crawler Workflow
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<!-- Describe what your workflow is for - i.e. what it is designed to achieve, what the organisational context of the workflow is, and what content it is designed to work with --> | <!-- Describe what your workflow is for - i.e. what it is designed to achieve, what the organisational context of the workflow is, and what content it is designed to work with --> | ||
| − | The purpose of this workflow is determine whether a site is suitable for capture with [https://github.com/webrecorder/browsertrix-crawler Browsertrix Crawler] and if so, run a Browsertrix crawl. The crawl is then subject to Quality Assurance. If the crawl is found to be unsatisfactory | + | The purpose of this workflow is determine whether a site is suitable for capture with [https://github.com/webrecorder/browsertrix-crawler Browsertrix Crawler] and if so, run a Browsertrix crawl. The crawl is then subject to Quality Assurance. If the crawl is found to be unsatisfactory Browsertrix settings are adjusted and the crawl is run again, with this process potentially being repeated several times until a satisfactory crawl is completed. If not satisfactory crawl can be made in this way, the site will be captured with Conifer. |
The steps are as follows: | The steps are as follows: | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
2. The site is assessed to determine which capture method is suitable. At this point we look at: | 2. The site is assessed to determine which capture method is suitable. At this point we look at: | ||
| − | * How large the site is | + | * How large the site is |
| − | * Does the site contain interactive content? | + | * Does the site contain interactive content? |
| − | * What is the planned capture frequency? (if the proposed capture is very frequent we may be more likely to use an in-house tool like Browsertrix to reduce costs) | + | * What is the planned capture frequency? (if the proposed capture is very frequent we may be more likely to use an in-house tool like Browsertrix to reduce costs) |
| − | * What level of fidelity is required | + | * What level of fidelity is required |
| − | * Have previous crawls of the site been attempted and what was the outcome | + | * Have previous crawls of the site been attempted and what was the outcome |
3. An initial decision of what capture technology to use is made | 3. An initial decision of what capture technology to use is made | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Evaluation/Review== | ==Evaluation/Review== | ||
<!-- How effective was the workflow? Was it replaced with a better workflow? Did it work well with some content but not others? What is the current status of the workflow? Does it relate to another workflow already described on the wiki? Link, explain and elaborate --> | <!-- How effective was the workflow? Was it replaced with a better workflow? Did it work well with some content but not others? What is the current status of the workflow? Does it relate to another workflow already described on the wiki? Link, explain and elaborate --> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Further Information== | ==Further Information== | ||
| Line 70: | Line 45: | ||
<!-- Note that your workflow will be marked with a CC3.0 licence --> | <!-- Note that your workflow will be marked with a CC3.0 licence --> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||