Difference between revisions of "Workflow:Extraction from the Pure Research Information System and transformation for loading by Archivematica"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Aalbinclark (talk | contribs) |
Aalbinclark (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Purpose, Context and Content== | ==Purpose, Context and Content== | ||
<!-- Describe what your workflow is for - i.e. what it is designed to achieve, what the organisational context of the workflow is, and what content it is designed to work with --> | <!-- Describe what your workflow is for - i.e. what it is designed to achieve, what the organisational context of the workflow is, and what content it is designed to work with --> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* Initial focus was upon research datasets. | * Initial focus was upon research datasets. | ||
* The work was carried out during the 2016/2017 academic year. | * The work was carried out during the 2016/2017 academic year. | ||
* The Ruby gem 'Preservation' was developed. This workflow is outlined in the accompanying README. | * The Ruby gem 'Preservation' was developed. This workflow is outlined in the accompanying README. | ||
| − | |||
==Evaluation/Review== | ==Evaluation/Review== | ||
Revision as of 13:49, 28 April 2021
Purpose, Context and Content
- Initial focus was upon research datasets.
- The work was carried out during the 2016/2017 academic year.
- The Ruby gem 'Preservation' was developed. This workflow is outlined in the accompanying README.
Evaluation/Review
It worked!
The pain points were failed transfers, although this was mitigated to some extent by a reporting feature built into the Preservation gem.
Further Information
https://rubygems.org/gems/preservation