Difference between revisions of "Workflow:Archiving outputs of 3D scanning"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
The workflow documents the process of creating 3D models (of objects) and their derivatives by a stereo-scanner, and specifies which outputs can and need to be archived. | The workflow documents the process of creating 3D models (of objects) and their derivatives by a stereo-scanner, and specifies which outputs can and need to be archived. | ||
== Data acquisition - scanning (and archiving?) == | == Data acquisition - scanning (and archiving?) == | ||
− | == Data processing == | + | === Data processing === |
** Generating and archiving 3D mesh. | ** Generating and archiving 3D mesh. | ||
** Positioning of the object based on its geometric properties. | ** Positioning of the object based on its geometric properties. | ||
+ | |||
== Output - generating and archiving standard drawings or set of views on the model. == | == Output - generating and archiving standard drawings or set of views on the model. == | ||
Revision as of 16:10, 28 February 2022
Workflow Description
Purpose, Context and Content
The workflow documents the process of creating 3D models (of objects) and their derivatives by a stereo-scanner, and specifies which outputs can and need to be archived.
Data acquisition - scanning (and archiving?)
Data processing
- Generating and archiving 3D mesh.
- Positioning of the object based on its geometric properties.
Output - generating and archiving standard drawings or set of views on the model.
Evaluation/Review
Further Information
Scanner software: https://www.polymetric.de/index.php?id=44&L=2 Core publications: Karasik, A. and Smilansky U. 2011. Computerized morphological classification of ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science 38(10):2644-2657. Karasik, A. and Smilansky U. 2008. 3D scanning technology as a standard archaeological tool for pottery analysis: practice and theory. Journal of Archaeological Science 35(5):1148-1168.