Difference between revisions of "Workflow:Assessing information"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
==Further Information== | ==Further Information== | ||
<!-- Provide any further information or links to additional documentation here --> | <!-- Provide any further information or links to additional documentation here --> | ||
| − | https:// | + | https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.67.3 |
<!-- Add four tildes below ("~~~~") to create an automatic signature, including your wiki username. Ensure your user page (click on your username to create it) includes an up to date contact email address so that people can contact you if they want to discuss your workflow --> | <!-- Add four tildes below ("~~~~") to create an automatic signature, including your wiki username. Ensure your user page (click on your username to create it) includes an up to date contact email address so that people can contact you if they want to discuss your workflow --> | ||
| + | [[User:Valentijn|Valentijn]] ([[User talk:Valentijn|talk]]) 11:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
[[Special:Contributions/172.104.134.96|172.104.134.96]] 11:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC) | [[Special:Contributions/172.104.134.96|172.104.134.96]] 11:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
<!-- Note that your workflow will be marked with a CC3.0 licence --> | <!-- Note that your workflow will be marked with a CC3.0 licence --> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:41, 5 October 2023
Workflow Description[edit]
A member of staff runs through a checklist to ensure that:
- The dataset confirms to the collection policy of the repository
- Data deposit contains no malware (all files).
- Digital objects are in correct formats (all files).
- Data deposit has collection-level metadata.
- All digital objects have core descriptive metadata (all files).
- Digital objects have additional technical metadata (all files).
- Digital objects can be opened, are valid, and can be reused (all files, representative sample for large datasets) .
- The data deposit has no sensitive data concerns (all files, representative sample for large datasets).
- Content is appropriate and complete (all files, representative sample for large datasets).
- The dataset is structured in a manner which is clear for the purposes of reusing data.
Purpose, Context and Content[edit]
Within the SEADDA consortium, workflows for dealing with assessing information were examined from three long standing digital repositories for archaeological data: the Archaeology Data Station of Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), the Swedish National Data Service (SND), and the Archaeology Data Service (ADS).
Evaluation/Review[edit]
Further Information[edit]
https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.67.3
Valentijn (talk) 11:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 172.104.134.96 11:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)