Difference between revisions of "COPTR to do list"

From COPTR
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(One line "stub" entries added with link to Special:ShortPages.)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Particular tasks that would help to improve COPTR:
 
Particular tasks that would help to improve COPTR:
* Add detail to existing tool pages, particularly adding User Experiences
+
* Add detail to existing tool pages, particularly adding User Experiences. Expand one line "stub" entries with more detailed information (http://coptr.digipres.org/Special:ShortPages).
* Catch incorrect RSS feed references or broken Ohloh widgets
+
* Catch incorrect RSS feed references or broken OpenHub widgets
 
* Add new tool entries for suggested tools listed on the [[Wish list of tools to add to COPTR]] page.
 
* Add new tool entries for suggested tools listed on the [[Wish list of tools to add to COPTR]] page.
* Develop category pages
+
* Add a general page explaining how to interpret the "Development Activity" information for none technical users, given various subtleties involved.
** Introductory text on [[:Category:Function]] and [[:Category:Content_Type]] pages such as that on the [[Category:Fixity]] page.
+
* Develop category pages:
 +
** <strike>Introductory text on [[:Category:Function]] and [[:Category:Content_Type]] pages such as that on the [[:Category:Fixity]] page.</strike> All the category pages now have definitions.
 
** Add explanatory text and additional information (reference guides, other relevant information) to each function and content category
 
** Add explanatory text and additional information (reference guides, other relevant information) to each function and content category
** Revise/refine function categories. Must be done with care!
+
** <strike>Revise/refine function categories. Must be done with care!</strike>
 
*** [[:Category:Forensic]] is a catch all that could improved
 
*** [[:Category:Forensic]] is a catch all that could improved
 
*** [[:Category:Web_Crawl]] is broader than just crawl. Could add an overarching "Web Archiving" category, then have sub categories. Would be nice to incorporate IPCC tool list page?
 
*** [[:Category:Web_Crawl]] is broader than just crawl. Could add an overarching "Web Archiving" category, then have sub categories. Would be nice to incorporate IPCC tool list page?
*** Pull together research data focused tools more clearly. Need to be careful not to create too much of a silo, so needs careful consideration.
+
*** Pull together research data focused tools more clearly. Need to be careful not to create too much of a silo, so needs careful consideration. Perhaps unnecessary?

Latest revision as of 09:15, 1 December 2014

Particular tasks that would help to improve COPTR:

  • Add detail to existing tool pages, particularly adding User Experiences. Expand one line "stub" entries with more detailed information (http://coptr.digipres.org/Special:ShortPages).
  • Catch incorrect RSS feed references or broken OpenHub widgets
  • Add new tool entries for suggested tools listed on the Wish list of tools to add to COPTR page.
  • Add a general page explaining how to interpret the "Development Activity" information for none technical users, given various subtleties involved.
  • Develop category pages:
    • Introductory text on Category:Function and Category:Content_Type pages such as that on the Category:Fixity page. All the category pages now have definitions.
    • Add explanatory text and additional information (reference guides, other relevant information) to each function and content category
    • Revise/refine function categories. Must be done with care!
      • Category:Forensic is a catch all that could improved
      • Category:Web_Crawl is broader than just crawl. Could add an overarching "Web Archiving" category, then have sub categories. Would be nice to incorporate IPCC tool list page?
      • Pull together research data focused tools more clearly. Need to be careful not to create too much of a silo, so needs careful consideration. Perhaps unnecessary?