Difference between revisions of "COPTR to do list"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Prwheatley (talk | contribs) |
(One line "stub" entries added with link to Special:ShortPages.) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Particular tasks that would help to improve COPTR: | Particular tasks that would help to improve COPTR: | ||
| − | * Add detail to existing tool pages, particularly adding User Experiences | + | * Add detail to existing tool pages, particularly adding User Experiences. Expand one line "stub" entries with more detailed information (http://coptr.digipres.org/Special:ShortPages). |
| − | * Catch incorrect RSS feed references or broken | + | * Catch incorrect RSS feed references or broken OpenHub widgets |
* Add new tool entries for suggested tools listed on the [[Wish list of tools to add to COPTR]] page. | * Add new tool entries for suggested tools listed on the [[Wish list of tools to add to COPTR]] page. | ||
| − | * Develop category pages | + | * Add a general page explaining how to interpret the "Development Activity" information for none technical users, given various subtleties involved. |
| − | ** Introductory text on [[:Category:Function]] and [[:Category:Content_Type]] pages | + | * Develop category pages: |
| + | ** <strike>Introductory text on [[:Category:Function]] and [[:Category:Content_Type]] pages such as that on the [[:Category:Fixity]] page.</strike> All the category pages now have definitions. | ||
** Add explanatory text and additional information (reference guides, other relevant information) to each function and content category | ** Add explanatory text and additional information (reference guides, other relevant information) to each function and content category | ||
| − | ** Revise/refine function categories. Must be done with care! | + | ** <strike>Revise/refine function categories. Must be done with care!</strike> |
*** [[:Category:Forensic]] is a catch all that could improved | *** [[:Category:Forensic]] is a catch all that could improved | ||
*** [[:Category:Web_Crawl]] is broader than just crawl. Could add an overarching "Web Archiving" category, then have sub categories. Would be nice to incorporate IPCC tool list page? | *** [[:Category:Web_Crawl]] is broader than just crawl. Could add an overarching "Web Archiving" category, then have sub categories. Would be nice to incorporate IPCC tool list page? | ||
| − | *** Pull together research data focused tools more clearly. Need to be careful not to create too much of a silo, so needs careful consideration. | + | *** Pull together research data focused tools more clearly. Need to be careful not to create too much of a silo, so needs careful consideration. Perhaps unnecessary? |
Latest revision as of 09:15, 1 December 2014
Particular tasks that would help to improve COPTR:
- Add detail to existing tool pages, particularly adding User Experiences. Expand one line "stub" entries with more detailed information (http://coptr.digipres.org/Special:ShortPages).
- Catch incorrect RSS feed references or broken OpenHub widgets
- Add new tool entries for suggested tools listed on the Wish list of tools to add to COPTR page.
- Add a general page explaining how to interpret the "Development Activity" information for none technical users, given various subtleties involved.
- Develop category pages:
Introductory text on Category:Function and Category:Content_Type pages such as that on the Category:Fixity page.All the category pages now have definitions.- Add explanatory text and additional information (reference guides, other relevant information) to each function and content category
Revise/refine function categories. Must be done with care!- Category:Forensic is a catch all that could improved
- Category:Web_Crawl is broader than just crawl. Could add an overarching "Web Archiving" category, then have sub categories. Would be nice to incorporate IPCC tool list page?
- Pull together research data focused tools more clearly. Need to be careful not to create too much of a silo, so needs careful consideration. Perhaps unnecessary?