Difference between revisions of "Workflow:Life Cycle of 3D Data for Cultural Heritage"
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
==Evaluation/Review== | ==Evaluation/Review== | ||
<!-- How effective was the workflow? Was it replaced with a better workflow? Did it work well with some content but not others? What is the current status of the workflow? Does it relate to another workflow already described on the wiki? Link, explain and elaborate --> | <!-- How effective was the workflow? Was it replaced with a better workflow? Did it work well with some content but not others? What is the current status of the workflow? Does it relate to another workflow already described on the wiki? Link, explain and elaborate --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Applied workflow in all team of the french consortium for 3D. This workflow is being updated to work with fields of humanities others than cultural heritage. | ||
==Further Information== | ==Further Information== |
Revision as of 09:51, 23 February 2022
Workflow Description
The steps are
– A0: acquired data
– V0: processed data
– V1n: hypotheses and restitutions loops and options
– V2: approved restitutions
Each step may be archived independently. The AIP should be properly linked.All steps may be gathered in a single archive.
Purpose, Context and Content
It presents the steps of the production process in a simplified way. The system of the graph has been defined to follow a logical path with notably the use of loops to express the recursive aspect of the work on data, especially during the hypothesis and restitution stages.
Evaluation/Review
Applied workflow in all team of the french consortium for 3D. This workflow is being updated to work with fields of humanities others than cultural heritage.
Further Information
Xavier Granier, Laurent Bergerot, Mehdi Chayani, Bruno Dutailly, Pascal Mora, et al. 3D lexicon for Human and Social Sciences. Recommendations of the "Consortium 3D for Humanities", 2021. ⟨hal-03187979⟩