Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From COPTR
Jump to: navigation, search
(Use of Level 1 section headings)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
::Great! It would also help to mention the template on the main page (I don't have edit rights there), as I didn't even know there was any! Anyway, I just updated the template myself.[[User:Johanvanderknijff|johanvanderknijff]] ([[User talk:Johanvanderknijff|talk]]) 16:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 
::Great! It would also help to mention the template on the main page (I don't have edit rights there), as I didn't even know there was any! Anyway, I just updated the template myself.[[User:Johanvanderknijff|johanvanderknijff]] ([[User talk:Johanvanderknijff|talk]]) 16:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 
==Rename imaging category?==
 
Another thing: people might end up mixing up the ''Image'' and ''Imaging'' categories. Maybe rename the latter to ''Disk Imaging'' to avoid this?
 
[[User:Johanvanderknijff|johanvanderknijff]] ([[User talk:Johanvanderknijff|talk]]) 16:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 
  
 
==Purpose field in infobox==
 
==Purpose field in infobox==
Line 23: Line 19:
 
:: Yes, that's what I thought as well. For some existing entries both are identical though, so it wasn't immediately clear.
 
:: Yes, that's what I thought as well. For some existing entries both are identical though, so it wasn't immediately clear.
 
[[User:Johanvanderknijff|johanvanderknijff]] ([[User talk:Johanvanderknijff|talk]]) 15:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 
[[User:Johanvanderknijff|johanvanderknijff]] ([[User talk:Johanvanderknijff|talk]]) 15:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
==Perhaps rename Imaging category to Disk Imaging?==
 +
Another thing: people might end up mixing up the ''Image'' and ''Imaging'' categories. Maybe rename the latter to ''Disk Imaging'' to avoid this?
 +
[[User:Johanvanderknijff|johanvanderknijff]] ([[User talk:Johanvanderknijff|talk]]) 16:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:15, 20 November 2013

Use of Level 1 section headings

I just had a first stab at some editing an existing entry, and creating a new one. One small thing I noticed: all of the pages I've seen use Level 1 headings for the main sections, but this is discouraged by the MediaWiki documentation (esp. since Level 1 is already used for the main heading of each entry). See e.g. here:

http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help_talk:Formatting#Level_1

And also:

http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Formatting

So maybe it would be better to change those to level 2 (also in all cases I've seen the child sections use level 3 headings)? Not a big deal of course but it's a bit ugly and it's probably easier to fix this now than postponing it to a later stage (also existing entries will most likely be used as a template for creating new ones, so the problem will get progressively worse if left as it is). I suppose this is also something that might mess up attempts at automated text extraction. johanvanderknijff (talk) 14:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Good point - I didn't know about this recommendation. It should be possible to automated this transformation using the Pywikibot framework and the mwparserfromhell. We could change the tool template now and use a bot to modify the rest? Andy Jackson (talk) 15:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Great! It would also help to mention the template on the main page (I don't have edit rights there), as I didn't even know there was any! Anyway, I just updated the template myself.johanvanderknijff (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Purpose field in infobox

Another thing I noticed is that for most entries the purpose field in the infobox more or less repeats what's already in the Description section. So maybe it's better to leave it out altogether (on the other hand it might be useful for automated discovery/analysis)? johanvanderknijff (talk) 14:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

The intention was the other way around - that the 'purpose' field was a brief description that might be published and re-used in other forms (due to being in the infobox), and the Description section should be more detailed. Andy Jackson (talk) 15:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes, that's what I thought as well. For some existing entries both are identical though, so it wasn't immediately clear.

johanvanderknijff (talk) 15:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps rename Imaging category to Disk Imaging?

Another thing: people might end up mixing up the Image and Imaging categories. Maybe rename the latter to Disk Imaging to avoid this? johanvanderknijff (talk) 16:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Contributors

Jukervin (10.2%), Danielle Plumer (11.8%), Chlara (17.8%), Prwheatley (5.6%), Andy Jackson (24.8%), Johanvanderknijff (29.9%)